0
Skip to Content
FloridaRule.com
Home
Civil Procedure
Criminal Procedure
Evidence
Florida Evidence Code
Federal Rules of Evidence
Appellate Procedure
Small Claims
Causes of Action
About
FloridaRule.com
Home
Civil Procedure
Criminal Procedure
Evidence
Florida Evidence Code
Federal Rules of Evidence
Appellate Procedure
Small Claims
Causes of Action
About
Home
Civil Procedure
Criminal Procedure
Folder: Evidence
Back
Florida Evidence Code
Federal Rules of Evidence
Appellate Procedure
Small Claims
Causes of Action
About

RULE 3.300. VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION, OATH, AND EXCUSING OF MEMBER

  • Before questioning, prospective jurors must be sworn to answer truthfully.
  • The judge may examine the jurors first, but both the State and the defense have a preserved right to question the jurors orally (voir dire).
  • The order of questioning is determined by the court.
  • The court can excuse a juror for cause if they are not qualified. If the court does not, either party may then use a challenge to remove the juror.

(a) Oath. The prospective jurors shall be sworn collectively or individually, as the court may decide. The form of oath shall be as follows:

“Do you solemnly swear (or affirm) that you will answer truthfully all questions asked of you as prospective jurors, so help you God?”

If any prospective juror affirms, the clause “so help you God” shall be omitted.

(b) Examination. The court may then examine each prospective juror individually or may examine the prospective jurors collectively. Counsel for both the state and defendant shall have the right to examine jurors orally on their voir dire. The order in which the parties may examine each juror shall be determined by the court. The right of the parties to conduct an examination of each juror orally shall be preserved.

(c) Prospective Jurors Excused. If, after the examination of any prospective juror, the court is of the opinion that the juror is not qualified to serve as a trial juror, the court shall excuse the juror from the trial of the cause. If, however, the court does not excuse the juror, either party may then challenge the juror, as provided by law or by these rules.

Copied!
Back to Table of Contents

1968 Adoption.

(a) Save for the inclusion of the form of oath, the suggested rule is a transcription of a part of section 913.02(1), Florida Statutes. The form of oath paraphrases in pertinent part the oath set out in section 913.11, Florida Statutes.

(b) The suggested rule is a transcription of the remainder of section 913.02(1), Florida Statutes.

(c) Substantially same as section 913.02(2), Florida Statutes.

1972 Amendment. (a) The language relating to competence to serve as jurors deleted as superfluous, (c) amended for clarification by inserting the clause “that such juror is not qualified to serve as a trial juror” for the clause “that such juror is incompetent.”

1980 Amendment. As to examination by parties, this brings rule 3.300(b) into conformity with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.431(b). This rule also allows the court to examine each prospective juror individually or collectively.

Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make no representations or warranties about the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any content. Use of this website is at your own risk, and we are not liable for any losses or damages arising from reliance on the information provided.

contact

Sitemaps: https://www.floridarule.com/sitemap.xml

https://www.floridarule.com/html-sitemap

FloridaRule.com

If this site has saved you time or made navigating Florida's legal rules easier, please consider supporting its upkeep. Your contribution helps cover hosting costs and allows me to keep the site fast, clean, and ad-free. Thank you for your support!

Support Me